Rate Your Experience

Here at the Uni High English Department, we value customer satisfaction above all. Please take a few minutes to answer a few short questions about your experiences this semester. And thank you for your many contributions to this class every day!

Second Period

Seventh Period

A Walking, Talking, Ranting Contradiction

No one knows what to make of Macon Detornay. As the novel’s paradoxical title indicates, he embodies contradictions—an “angry black white boy” who is capable of astounding arrogance and a hyperbolic sense of his own importance, relentless in his criticism of white people and the privileges they blithely enjoy, but just as relentless in his self-scrutiny, which lies at the heart of his critique: “I’m here to tell the white man in the mirror the truth to his face.” When we’re annoyed with Macon, it’s usually because he seems to exempt himself from the vast swath of “whiteness” that is the target of his attacks: he aspires to “transcendent status,” the one rare white person who might fully escape his birthright as a privileged American and commit himself to the radical struggle for racial justice. Readers may want to ask, with Nique, “What’s up with all this ‘white people’ shit? You like an undercover brother or something?” (49).

Macon is capable of astonishing chutzpah, as when he attends a meeting of the Black Student Union, in the recently rechristened Malcolm X lounge, the only white person in the room (needless to say), and immediately starts challenging their suggestions for a guest speaker: “He was blacker than each and every one of these bourgeois motherfuckers” (123). He models himself after Malcolm X—a pretty high standard in terms of integrity and commitment to the cause. He smugly dismisses the 1960s feminist militant Angela Davis as “irrelevant,” the blaxploitation icon Pam Grier as “sagging,” the politically militant rapper Chuck D of Public Enemy as “finished,” and Nobel Prize-winning author Toni Morrison as “Oprahfied.” Most contemporary black icons don’t meet his standards. He’s also quick to distinguish himself from other white boys who are into hip-hop (don’t even mention the Beastie Boys to him), other white writers who aspired to take part in black culture (“corny greyboy Jack Kerouac and his one-sided love affair with jazz” [26]), and other white revolutionaries (even throwing shade on John Brown—who led a raid on a federal armory in an effort to inspire a widespread slave uprising across the South and was executed for his efforts, a couple years before the federal government did the same thing). Who does this guy think he is?

The novel opens in Macon’s first-person voice, in a monologue that seems to be set at the end of his story, on a “Birmingham bus,” “broadcasting live and direct from the getaway ride as the scene of the crime fades away” (1). We are confronted with Macon’s beguiling tangle of contradictions from the very start as he tries to establish himself as “one good white person” when he laments that no news outlet ever called him “the white Bigger Thomas” (2)—readers of Richard Wright’s 1940 protest novel Native Son will laugh incredulously at such an audacious and nonsensical statement.

But by chapter 1, a third-person omniscient narrator has taken over. This narrator is sometimes closely aligned with Macon’s perspective, representing his interior thoughts and memories, and relentlessly cataloging his acute self-consciousness, the insecure, nervously sweating, self-doubting kid underneath this bold and cocky exterior. The scene in chapter 2 of book 1, when Macon meets Andre for the first time, is remarkable as a portrayal of painful awkwardness and racially inflected self-consciousness. We learn that Macon has been anticipating this moment all summer—not only did he request a black roommate, he’s requested Andre Walker specifically because he’s a descendant of Fleet Walker, the last African American baseball player to play in the major leagues before segregation in 1889. Macon is aware that his scheme will sound crazy to Andre, and he’s right. But even beyond his revelation of their historical connection, which wigs Andre out (“Wow. What am I supposed to do with that?” [29]), there’s a relentless self-consciousness to their interaction throughout. Macon is so proud of his purported degree of comfort around black people, his deep knowledge of hip-hop culture and black history, that he’s sharply attuned to the racial subtext of every single turn in the conversation. Even when he leans back on his bed, a seemingly innocuous and even commonplace posture for a dorm-mate to assume while shooting the breeze, he scrutinizes himself for how such a posture might be interpreted by Andre: “He threw a leg over his half-unpacked suitcase and leaned back, then wondered if the posture was too comfortable too quick, a typical cavalier-whiteboy-lounging-cuz-the-world-is-my-domain move” (32). This self-consciousness is a big part of Macon’s point: he wants to shake white people out of their complacent stupor, to get them to recognize all the small ways that privilege underwrites their lives, how they simply occupy space with a sense of entitlement. We should all be stopping to think before we throw our legs casually over the half-unpacked suitcase, so to speak. Every movement of his body and every word he says in this first interaction with Andre is potentially charged with meaning. Macon wants to make a good first impression, and he knows that he’ll come across as something of an enigma to Andre (which he does).

It’s important, I think, that Mansbach gives us such thorough access to Macon’s self-doubting interior monologue in this scene, as it’s a vital counterweight to his verbal bombast elsewhere. We have a would-be “race traitor” who thinks of himself as more radical than John Brown and on par with Malcolm X in terms of black militant street cred who is also very much putting on a front, trying desperately to make his behavior and words display his commitments—renouncing his whiteness doesn’t mean tinting his skin; it means presenting a certain face (and voice) to the world, advertising his abdication of white privilege with every word and gesture. He’s constantly worried that he’ll be revealed as just another poseur or wannabe, another in a long line of blackface-minstrel appropriations of blackness, and Andre’s acceptance of him and his ideological commitments is vital to his sense of his own legitimacy. It must be exhausting to be Macon.

But this scene would read quite differently if we only had Macon’s point of view. We would see the would-be white-antiracist superhero as he sees himself, and this would reveal a profound degree of self-consciousness and self-doubt under his bold façade. But Andre would remain an enigma, seen only through Macon’s eager-to-please eyes: a symbolic black roommate against which he can gauge how “down” he is. But Mansbach’s narrator has access to Andre’s point of view as well, and throughout this dialogic scene we see him reacting to Macon and his performance, and that reaction is full of skepticism. Andre emerges as a three-dimensional and complex character with his own complicated relationship to whiteness. As an alumnus of a prestigious, predominantly white prep school in Los Angeles, Andre has some context for Macon’s sales pitch: “Andre didn’t feel like listening to his roommate relieve himself [of white guilt]. He’d already served his time in prep school as a cardboard self-affirmation cutout. . . . A stoic, amiable receptacle into which fake-empathetic whiteboys dumped their views, a priest who heard confessions and smoked joints with the sinners to absolve them” (31). Andre is fully alert to the ways Macon seems to be making a “token” out of him, treating their conversation as a “confession” for which he expects “absolution,” and he’s not having it. To a significant extent, his qualms are justified—Macon is quite literally aiming for some kind of “cosmic,” historical reconciliation between the descendants of Fleet Walker and Cap Anson, after all. But we do hear some grudging props from Andre as well: “Macon might be a lunatic, and his bloodlines were certainly polluted, but at least he was hip hop enough not to view black people as an alien species” (34).

We get Nique’s perspective, too, and in the scene in chapter 3, in Nique’s dorm room, Macon’s interior monologue is outnumbered by the perspectives of the African American men he’s so eager to impress. Mansbach even ends the chapter with Nique and Andre alone in the room after Macon has left. Like Andre earlier, Nique gives Macon some grudging respect: “[A]t least your boy there’s trying. More than you can say for most of them” (54). We see that Macon’s performance hasn’t met with unqualified success, however, as Andre and Nique compare him to Harley Koon (a former classmate and the son of one of the cops who was acquitted for the beating of Rodney King, whose story is told in detail in the next chapter, background characterization for Andre and Nique and the personal significance of the LA Riots of 1992 that Macon is not privy to—we know more about their background than he does).

Even as they take on the role of managers for Macon’s “career” as a white antiracist activist and provocateur, booking him media appearances and managing his public image, Andre and Nique make it clear that the jury remains out. Andre says, “I’ve decided to believe in you until you give me reason not to” (149), and Nique is even more blunt: “Personally, I still think you’re full of shit, but hell, go ’head and keep proving me wrong” (163).

Angry Black White Boy is a much more interesting book, in my view, because it doesn’t offer a single, uncritical perspective on its would-be hero. It’s clear that Macon and Adam Mansbach have a lot in common: Mansbach himself is deeply literate in the history of hip-hop culture; he didn’t have to do research to put together his riffs on the commercialization of the genre in the 1990s, or why The Low-End Theory by A Tribe Called Quest is such a “good choice” as the warmup track to his poetry reading (162). The author knows his black history and black literature, and his book seems to aim to achieve something like what Macon himself wants to achieve—to get white readers to look critically at themselves and their own privilege, and to challenge them to live in such a way that not only doesn’t take advantage of white supremacy but actively seeks to undermine it. We can tell that the author endorses Macon’s ideas to a considerable extent, but he also presents a deeply flawed, self-contradicting, often delusional hero whose sincerity and commitment (and, indeed, sanity) is under question from the very start. There’s a remarkable moral courage in Macon’s willingness to scrutinize and try to transcend his own whiteness, and his arrogance is tempered by a genuine self-critical gaze. But it’s never clear to what extent we’re supposed to affirm and admire Macon, and as the story gets increasingly outlandish, it’s not always easy to tell where the author is in relation to his creation.

No one knows what to make of Macon Detornay. Least of all the author himself.